Ethereum has long faced challenges with network congestion and rising fees. By processing transactions off-chain, rollups offer a path toward higher throughput and lower costs, unlocking the full potential of decentralized applications.
The Ethereum base layer supports approximately 15 transactions per second and often suffers from fee spikes during peak usage. Applications from DeFi to NFTs compete for limited block space, driving gas prices to prohibitive levels.
Rollups emerged as Layer 2 scaling solutions that handle execution off-chain while leveraging Ethereum’s security. They have become a cornerstone of Ethereum’s roadmap since 2020, promising relief from congestion without sacrificing decentralization.
Rollup technology began to take shape in 2018 and 2019, culminating in Ethereum’s October 2020 pivot to a rollup-centric vision. Developers and community leaders recognized that only by moving execution off-chain could Ethereum scale effectively.
By late 2023, rollups were processing roughly twice the transaction volume of the Ethereum Mainnet. In 2024 alone, users submitted over 2.4 billion transactions across major Layer 2 networks. The March 2024 Dencun upgrade, including EIP-4844 (Danksharding), further reduced data costs, cementing rollups’ role in the ecosystem.
At a high level, rollups bundle hundreds or thousands of transactions into a single batch, then commit data or proofs back to Ethereum. Users deposit assets into a rollup’s smart contract on Layer 1, which serves as the deposit and withdrawal gateway.
Sequencers or validators process transactions on the Layer 2 network, updating the off-chain state. Each batch generates a new Merkle state root. The rollup smart contract on Ethereum stores these roots, ensuring integrity through Merkle state root updates.
For ZK rollups, a cryptographic SNARK validity proofs accompanies each batch. Ethereum verifies the proof instantly, achieving final settlement within minutes. Optimistic rollups assume correctness by default and rely on a challenge period, typically seven days, for fraud proofs.
Once data or proofs are posted, users can withdraw funds back to Ethereum. ZK rollups enable fast exits, settling in under an hour, while optimistic withdrawals follow the challenge window to maintain security.
Rollups come in two primary flavors. Both compress transaction data and secure interactions on Layer 1, but they differ in validation models and latency.
Rollups deliver transformative gains across multiple dimensions:
Key numbers illustrate their power. A rollup batch can include up to 750 KB of calldata, enabling ~62,500 transfers per batch. Gas per transfer drops from ~45,000 on L1 to ~256 gas worth of calldata plus proof verification.
Several leading Layer 2 networks showcase rollup innovation:
Despite dramatic progress, rollups face ongoing challenges. Centralization risks arise when a single sequencer controls transaction ordering. Projects are exploring decentralization through multi-party sequencing and MEV auctions.
ZK proof complexity still demands significant compute resources, impacting cost and proof latency. Meanwhile, user experience hurdles include bridging assets and navigating different security models.
Inter-rollup liquidity fragmentation remains an open issue. Efforts toward shared liquidity layers and atomic cross-rollup swaps aim to create a cohesive ecosystem. Looking ahead, enhancements like improved proof systems and data availability strategies may raise throughput ceilings even further.
Rollups represent the short- and medium-term scaling foundation for Ethereum, striking a balance between throughput, cost, and security. As the network evolves through sharding and further Layer 2 innovation, rollups will continue to drive Ethereum’s growth and global adoption.
References
